There is a lot of confusion as to the origin of the term Afrikaner as
well as general ignorance to how this term has been used &
applied [ sometimes arbitrarily ] to different peoples within southern
Africa over the course of a few centuries. The term originally used was
Afrikander: a Dutch word for African [ & used well into the
nineteenth cent. by authors ] - by the Dutch East India Company to
loosely describe the White & mixed race [ proto Coloureds: who were significantly descended from Asians ]
peoples who were born in Africa. There was no sense that it was being
used to describe any single emerging ethnicity being formed on African
soil, as it was simply a geographical term / descriptor similar to the
use of the term European to describe those who were born on European
soil. To this day there is no ethnic group in Europe named after the
term used for the continent.
The term Afrikaner was
first used in open court in 1707 when a defendant named Hendrik Biebouw
was referring to himself as an African & as such could not be
judged by the European power. The Afrikaner Broederbond of the 20th
cent. later used this as a pretext to co-opt all White Afrikaans
speakers under the rubric of the amorphous Afrikaner designation.
The
term was however used prior to 1707 & referred to anyone who
was born in Africa from the various peoples & races the VOC
dumped at the Cape during the 17th cent. The term was used in a general
geographical context & was not reserved for any singular ethnic
group. Thus under the original usage of the term: the Coloured
population as well as "free Blacks" were a section within the Afrikaner
designation. It was not used to describe just White people born on
African soil.
The term Afrikaner has always been a
complex term whose definition has changed from time to time. It was
initially used by the VOC to describe anyone who was born in Africa of
White & mixed race descent & it was of course first used
in a public context in 1707 when the aforementioned Hendrik Biebouw was
in court asserting the he was an African [ Afrikaner ] who does not
want to be ruled from Europe. There were Trekboers & Boers who
called themselves Africans [ Afrikaners ] but they also simultaneously
saw themselves as distinct from the Cape Dutch of the Western Cape [ 1 ]
ie: the bulk of the folks who later appropriated [ & or were
assigned to ] the term Afrikaner from the late 19th cent onwards. During
the early 19th cent a group of mixed race Basters used this term
calling themselves Afrikaners led by a one Jager Afrikaner. [ 2 ] It was
not until the late 19th cent & 1875 in particular when the term
Afrikaner was now being used by the Cape Dutch descendents when a few
intellectuals from Paarl [ & two from Holland ] started a
language rights movement. [ 3 ] These newly baptized "Afrikaners" then
attempted to export the term Afrikaner in a dispossessing political
context onto the Boers mainly via the Afrikaner Bond: an Afrikaans
speaking Cape political party with an aim of creating a loose pan White
Afrikaans nationalism. [ false nationalism: as lumping two ethnics into
one is the opposite of nationalism. ] President Paul Kruger of the ZAR
& President Marthinus Steyn of the OVS rejected the overtures of
the Afrikaner Bond [ 4 ] & the Boers of the Boer Republics
generally rejected these overtures. The high ranking F W Reitz being a
notable exception. Therefore the term Afrikaner is not an ethnic term as
it includes Cape Dutch / Griquas / Boers / Basters & Cape
Coloureds in general. Thus referring to someone as an Afrikaner is an
amorphous description & is akin to referring to someone as
British which covers Scot / English / Welsh & Northern Irish.
The term Afrikaner is a geographical term & everyone in Africa
is technically an Afrikaner. Those who insist that Afrikaners are only
those of Cape Dutch & Boer descent are in fact clinging to
revisionist post 1930s artificial official definition of which most Cape Dutch
& Boers never consented to as it was a political decision made
on behalf of the Afrikaner Broederbond: a then semi secret organization
generally unknown to most folks.
None other than JBM
Hertzog [ the founder of the original National Party & later
Prime Minister ] asserted that one does not have to be an Afrikaans
speaker in order to be an Afrikaner as he recognized English speakers as
Afrikaners too. [ 5 ] Further demonstrating the amorphous nature of the
term Afrikaner as it includes not just Afrikaans speakers of varied
cultural / racial groups but also English speakers who identify with
Africa more than with Britain. This is all the term Afrikaner ever meant
- therefore those who promote it are also promoting the marginalization
of the constituent groups who fall under the macro designation. The
Afrikaner Party of the 1940s itself was started by the followers of JBM
Hertzog who promoted his pan Afrikaans speaking & English
speaking coalition of the term Afrikaner. No one for example would call
Acadians "French Canadians" as it would marginalize the actual Acadians
even though they are also French speaking Canadians because the term
French Canadian is historically applied to the French speaking
inhabitants of Quebec & Ontario. The Quebec portion of which
since the 1960s now often refer to themselves as Quebecois. The folks of
Boer descent are similarly marginalized & dispossessed under
the macro / umbrella term Afrikaner as the Boers are outnumbered by the
Cape Dutch portion.
Now of course someone can indeed
be of Afrikaans ancestry who no longer speaks Afrikaans & thus
not viewed as an Afrikaner just as one can be of French ancestry but not
necessarily speak French. Like many of the modern era Cajuns of
Louisiana. J M Coetzee is a perfect example of someone of at least
partial Afrikaans ancestry but would be rejected as an Afrikaner by
those who define Afrikaner as an Afrikaans speaking person. Though
someone like JBM Hertzog would accept Coetzee as an "English Afrikaner"
along with his "Afrikaans Afrikaner" designation to describe the macro
Afrikaans speakers. When attempting to refer to someone's ethnicity one
should avoid the term Afrikaner as its definition is amorphous &
ever changing & has been used by Afrikaner Nationalists [ political group of Afrikaans Collectivists who were the twentieth cent manifestation of the Afrikaner Bond & run by the
Afrikaner Broederbond ] to describe both Cape Dutch & Boer
descendents. The Afrikaners are not a single ethnic group but a diverse
& heterogeneous continental / geographical group - whereas Boers
/ Cape Dutch / Griquas / Basters & Cape Malays are ethnic
groups. Further someone can be of Boer descent but speak English or be
of Griqua descent but speak German.
The following is
from Cape Slavery Heritage. [
cape-slavery-heritage.iblog.co.za/category/original-black-afrikaners ]
Demonstrating a gradual change in definition. Quote: [ As the ‘Regte
Afrikaner’ (True Afrikaner) movement grew stronger amongst the white
descendents of the early European colonists, so the term ‘Afrikaner’
receded in usage amongst the people that the British labelled Coloured.
For the new Afrikaner nationalists, ‘Bruine-Afrikaners’ (Brown
Afrikaners) were not ‘Regte Afrikaners’ but ‘Kleurlinge’ - ‘creatures of
colour’. And so the Cape Creole Coloured cousins of the ‘Regte
Afrikaners’, through new political movements, began to reach out to
their indigene African cousins. ]
Quote: [ The early
emergence of the term Afrikaner and Afrikaans as a language is rooted in
the emergence of a coloured Cape Creole people. In the early 1700s the
term Afrikaner was generally used to refer to mulatto Cape born slaves
and Free Blacks. It was only in the mid 1800s that the term found favour with the forebears of present day White Afrikaners. ]
Quote:
[ This was the world in which 17 year old Hendrik had grown up. This
young man`s world was sans identity boundaries and disconnected from the
establishment world. He saw himself as one of those local Afrikaners,
like his sister born of a slave mother and other mates of mixed roots.
He certainly would have been aware that at the time the word Afrikaner
was not generally used by members of polite white society to describe
themselves no matter what gripes they had with the VOC. The story
further illustrates that the Afrikaner identity first emerged as an
identity within the coloured and mixed working class community outside
of the powerful colonial establishment and respectable classes. ]
This is how author Augustus Henry Keane describes the term Afrikander / Afrikaner.
Quote:
[ Afrikander: at first an African-born White with a strain of native (
Hottentot ) blood; later, any African-born White, Dutch or English, as
in Afrikander Bond. ]
From: The Boer States: Land and People. Augustus Henry Keane. Page xv.
The distinct nature of the Boers was noted as well in Chapter One of The Great Trek by Oliver Ransford.
Quote:
[ More and more Boers followed the pioneers into the interior where
conditions suited them so well that they experienced a minor population
explosion and formed the nucleus of a new nation. They were as nomadic
as the Hottentots, or as the antelope they hunted. Trekking for them
became a way of life. ]
Now if the Boers are
supposedly part of the "same" nation as the Cape Dutch then one would
expect that Cape Town would be the "nucleus" of this nation. The fact
that the Trekboers of the Cape frontiers became the "nucleus of a new
nation" & also had "a population explosion" DEMONSTRATES that
the Boers are a distinct people / group from the Cape Dutch whom the
Boers moved away from starting 150 years before the Great Trek.
Notes.
1. Quote: [ Trekboers certainly recognised the differences in language,
religion, etc. between themselves and the British. They had certainly
developed a way-of-life and a set of values that were distinctive, but
they were also significantly different from people of Dutch descent in
the western province areas of the Cape. The latter regarded the
Trekboers as rather wild, semi-barbarous frontiersmen and the sense of
common identity was limited and incomplete. The westerners followed the
Trek with interest and probably with a good deal of sympathy, but they
certainly did not see the trekkers as the saviours of some mystical
Afrikaner ‘nation’. ]
From: Professor Wallace Mills. The Great Trek.
Quote: [
when the British invaded in 1795, a number of trekboers were in
rebellion and had declared themselves a republic. It is important to
remember that this tradition predated the coming of the British.
Trekboer political notions were very close to anarchy. Please note that
‘anarchy’ is not a synonym for chaos. Anarchy involves a desire for
little or no government or authority; it is a social and legal system
where law and order are maintained by social pressures and informal
means rather than authority figures or structures. ]
From: The VOC Period.
2.
Quote: [ The most famous of the Orlam (Malay for 'wise guys') was Jager
Afrikaner, an escaped Khoisan farm worker. His group called themselves
"Afrikaners" after him. When they migrated to central Namiba, the
Afrikaners stole sheep from the Nama. In retaliation, the Nama called
them "Gu-nu", 'sheep stealers'. ]
From: Disparate Cultures: Shock Of the Other, Collision, Apartness, and Resolution.
3.
Quote: [ The Genootskap van Regte Afrikaners (Afrikaans for "Society of
Real Afrikaners") was formed on 14 August 1875 in the town of Paarl by a
group of Afrikaans speakers from the current Western Cape region. From
15 January 1876 the society published a journal in Afrikaans called Die
Afrikaanse Patriot ("The African Patriot") as well as a number of books,
including grammars, dictionaries, religious material and histories. Die
Afrikaanse Patriot was succeeded in 1905 by today's Paarl newspaper. ]
From: Genootskap van Regte Afrikaners.
4.
Quote: [ In the republics the Bond did not flourish. Neither President
Brand nor President Kruger wanted his authority questioned ] Page 44 of
The Anglo-Boer Wars. Michael Barthorp.
5. The
definition of Afrikaner has changed numerous times. The JBM Hertzog
definition was anyone regardless of language who saw Africa as their
home & wanted to build an Afrikaans / English coalition. During
the early 19th cent the term was reserved for the mixed race folks of
the Cape. The Malan definition stressed White Afrikaans speakers only
which was mainly a coalition between Cape Dutch & Boer. Those
who cling to this definition are in fact clinging to an outdated pre
1950s definition of the term as more Boers & even Cape Dutch
have opted out of the designation & other non-White Afrikaans
speakers have opted into the designation.
Quote: [
Hertzog had always recognized that there were two groups both deeply
rooted in South Africa, the English and the Dutch. he accepted them as
"twin streams", equal but separate, and believed that both could be
called Afrikaners in the widest sense. He insisted that each group
should educate its children in its own language - although each group should
learn the language of the other. ]
Page 59. The White Tribe of Africa. David Harrison.
The
manner in which the mid 20th cent version of the term Afrikaner was
adopted was telling as it was adopted without much critical thought by
those who were promoting it. One of the founders of the Afrikaner
Broederbond - Henning Klopper - even admitted as much after he attended
speeches by JBM Hertzog.
Quote: [ Immediately after
the speech, nineteen year old Henning Klopper now a railway clerk in his
first job, attended a meeting with seven others at Oogies station,
where they passed a resolution supporting Herztog. Klopper was elected
secretary and sent off a telegram "saying we would stand firmly behind
him... It just came out of your whole being. You couldn't suppress it. You were an Afrikaner and that's all about it". Hertzog's inevitable confrontation with Botha came when he was dropped from the cabinet. ]
Page 61 The White Tribe of Africa.
Here is more on Hertzog's definition of an Afrikaner.
Quote:
[ Even as Dr. Malan, [ continued Hertzog ] they have taken an oath
secretly to permit no co-operation from the English side with an eye to
national unity, and in this way they stand in direct racial conflict
with our English fellow Afrikaners, striving by means of
Afrikaans-speaking domination to place the foot on the neck of the
English speaking South African. ]
JBM Hertzog. Page 100. The White Tribe of Africa.
The
term Afrikaner was not defined to refer to all White Afrikaans speakers
until the early to mid 20th cent when the Broederbond began to rewrite
history after they took / usurped control of the history books. The
Human & Rouseau publishing company in Cape Town was instrumental in this
endeavour. The term Afrikaner was redefined to refer to those of Cape
Dutch & Boer descent under one umbrella thus marginalizing the
distinct & smaller Boer Nation.
Popular Posts
-
The Boers are a distinct people / nation from the bulk of the Afrikaner population. Quote: [ More and more Boers followed the pion...
-
from I Luv SA (Source: Cape Argus) Linda Pereira and Jeremy Clarkson can go and flog themselves. Or if that’s not logistically possibl...
-
by Alex Newman , from The New American: While most of the world refuses to acknowledge what is happening in largely communist-controlled S...
-
SA Promo Magazine commented on Jacob Zuma’s Freedom Day speech on 27 April 2013. They suggest that he confused the date with 1 April, as he...
-
from Censor Bugbear reports : Analysing this past year in South Africa, some very grim statistics emerge. Two of the worst ones leap out a...

Monday, 4 March 2013
The Origin of the Afrikaner Designation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment